EsDeeKid slams The Chainsmokers for releasing unauthorized remix
EsDeeKid reacts to a high-profile remix of his track ‘4 Raws’ by The Chainsmokers, sparking conversation about remix culture.
A remix posted on YouTube and SoundCloud caused controversy after British rapper EsDeeKid criticized The Chainsmokers for releasing it. The anonymous rapper has sparked conversation not just for his music, but for his blunt online presence and the mystery around his identity. His reaction to the remix quickly pulled fans, artists, and industry watchers into a larger debate.
EsDeeKid took to X to express his disapproval of the unauthorized Chainsmokers remix of his track 4 Raws. In the context of his tweet, DSPs refers to Digital Service Providers, a term commonly used to describe platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube. Posting to DSPs often signals a more official release rather than a casual upload.
The remix has since been taken down from all platforms. On SoundCloud, only fan-made remixes of EsDeeKid’s music remain, something that’s long been part of underground music culture. Still, the situation highlights the thin line between creative reinterpretation and formal distribution without consent.
In many cases, remixes actually help songs reach wider audiences. Especially in electronic music, a remix can introduce a track to new listeners, DJs, and festival crowds who might not have discovered the original otherwise. For emerging artists, that kind of exposure can be invaluable and even career-changing.
EsDeeKid’s rise has also been fueled by fan speculation about his identity, including a viral theory linking him to Timothée Chalamet. While partly playful, that attention helped push his profile far beyond underground circles. A high-profile moment came when Timothée Chalamet appeared in a video with him, sparking even more attention and conversation around his persona.
The controversy over the Chainsmokers remix underscores the delicate balance between exposure and ownership. While the remix arguably raised 4 Raws profile, it also sparked questions about who gets to benefit when someone else reshapes an artist’s work.




